And that is exactly what P. Kevin Castel did when he issued his September 5, 2014 Final Order, which confirmed the fraudulently procured “Final Award” of Schnader LLP attorney and board of director for the American Arbitration Association, Timothy K. Lewis. Castel did not even compel William Morris and Loeb & Loeb LLP to respond to my March 17, 2014 Motion [Republican appointed federal judge Robert P. Paterson did the same thing when Leonard Rowe submitted his March 2012 Fraud Upon the Court Motion alleging that his former attorneys from Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP (now known as Dentons LLP) conspired with counsel from William Morris (e.g. Michael P. Zweig and Helen Gavaris of Loeb & Loeb LLP) and Creative Artists Agency to conceal smoking gun evidence (e.g. “Exhibit 31”)]. He then issued an Order refusing to disqualify himself, but made absolutely no mention that arbitrator David L. Gregory issued an Award determining liability (and indicating what damages I would receive  or more importantly, that I sought the imposition of extreme disciplinary and monetary sanctions against Michael P. Zweig, Christian Carbone and Loeb & Loeb LLP — including default judgement and more than $250 million —  due to their “pattern” of engaging in “fraud upon the Court” on William Morris’ behalf, intentional violations of numerous rules under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, as well as violation of New York Law section 487 and other laws.

Since Castel refused to address this issue, I filed a Motion for Reconsideration on April 11, 2014. This was a condensed version of my March 17, 2014 Motion. Once again, William Moris and Loeb & Loeb LLP submitted no oppositional Motion. I later asked for an oral hearing by letter and Castel denied it as being “moot,” but it is clear that based on the procedural and substantive complexity of the issues presented and the numerous factual errors and omissions contained in Castel’s Final Order, we should have discussed the various issues that were raised in these two Motions (e.g. disqualification of federal judges, “fraud upon the Court,” partially confirming Arbitrator Gregory’s Partial Final Award, the finality of Arbitrator Gregory’s Partial Final Award, the illegality of Arbitrator Gregory’s disqualification, etc.) “under oath” or before an impartial jury — especially since P. Kevin Castel took the drastic measure of imposing a filing injunction against me and prejudicing my appeal by saying it would not be made in “good faith.”  When Castel issued his Final Order, he once again made no mention of the pyramid of evidence I presented which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that I have been defrauded and deprived of my constitutional and statutory rights under the color of law due to the “highly unethical and criminal” actions of William Morris, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Michael P. Zweig, Christian Carbone, Timothy K. Lewis and many others, including P. Kevin Castel himself [majority who just so happen to be white and/or “Jewish” males]. Castel has always acted as an attorney for the Defendants and their counsel by issuing one-side opinions that distort the facts and flout the law. As a result of the fraud engaged in by the Defendants, Loeb & Loeb LLP, the American Arbitration Association and Timothy K. Lewis, this gave the racist and corrupt, Republican appointed federal judge the pretext that would allow for William Morris to obtain a favorable verdict without a jury trial and make it appear like I engaged in extreme “bad faith” throughout the entire case in order to justify imposing a filing injunction against me that would  prevent me from pursuing claims of fraud, obstruction of justice, conspiracy to interfere with human rights of African Americans, etc. in a separate case.

In the same way that that the term “fraud upon the Court” cannot be found in Castel’s Final Order, Castel has never once discussed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and New York City Human Rights Law or demonstrated that he has an understanding of the statute’s public policy goals. He has never discussed the unrefuted historical, statistical, circumstantial, anecdotal and other forms of evidence that I have presented spanning 116 years which proves intentional violations of federal, state and local law prohibiting discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color and national origin, which occurred before, during and after my employment or mentioned that there were zero African American Agents, Coordinators or Agent Trainees employed at the company’s New York City office when I began in September 2008, that my claims also included disparate impact or that I sought permanent injunctive and affirmative relief. From the beginning, Castel tried to make it seem like this was an isolated case of individual disparate treatment and that this evidence was irrelevant. This was an argument that was later used by Loeb & Loeb LLP in arbitration, while calling my racist and “anti-Semitic.” In the same way that Castel narrowed the claims that I raised in my 80 page Complaint and Oppositional Motion to Arbitrate, he narrowed every single argument that I made in my March 17, 2014 Fraud Upon the Court Motion and misapplied the law. Based on Castel’s actions in this case, it is now clear that all of his decisions were predetermed. Castel has violated the Constitution, numerous Canons under the Judicial Code of Conduct and his Oath of Office in order to ensure that the merits of my case were not decided by an impartial jury, Castel’s unlawful actions have wasted nearly four years of my life and he must be held accountable for his actions because “no man is above the law.” He has intentionally deprived me of my constitutional and statutory rights under the color of law, and is engaging in a larger conspiracy to interfere with the human rights of people of African descent, or in the alternative, conspiring to maintain global white/”Jewish” supremacy (racism).

Source: Plaintiff’s March 17, 2014 Fraud Upon the Court Motion, 81; Pl. Fraud Upon the Court Petition, 15.