“Exhibit 31”:

Do you think the dishonorable federal judge Robert P. Patterson would have been able to write a 175 page decision granting summary judgment in favor of William Morris and Creative Artists Agency, thus preventing a jury trial, had the underlying e-mails to “Exhibit 31” been produced? Do you think an impartial, New York City jury would have ruled in favor of William Morris and Creative Artists Agency if they’ saw hundreds of e-mails showing their employees referring to African Americans as “nigger,” “nigga,” “coon,” “Uncle Tom” and other racially derogatory terms in their in and out-going messages? Had it been determined that the company had been discriminating against black concert promoters, do you think the company would have had more than zero African American [music] Agents employed when I began working at the New York City office of the company in September of 2008? Do you think William Morris would have hired Loeb & Loeb LLP and Michael P. Zweig to represent them in my case, five years later,  had this smoking gun evidence not been concealed in 2002? Important questions to think about…