Tagged: Rowe Entertainment v. William Morris Agency

read the January 24, 2014 transcript of Leonard Rowe ripping 90 year old Republican federal judge Robert P. Patterson a new asshole for allowing and engaging in “fraud upon the Court” throughout his 16 year old case!!!

I was present at the actual hearing, but it’s taken me nearly 11 months to get my hands on this transcript due to my dire economic circumstances. This was Rowe’s first time getting the chance to actually speak to Patterson, since he was represented by counsel in the past. I bet Patterson regretted giving Rowe the opportunity to conduct the conference telephonically because Rowe let him have it! I think everyone should read what was actually said at this hearing. No federal judge would allow a litigant to speak to him/her in the way Rowe did, unless, that judge knew that the litigant was telling the truth! Our judicial system is an embarrassment if federal judges can get away with violating the Constitution, the law, numerous canons under the Judicial Code of Conduct, as well as their Oath of Office, without any repercussions or punishment!!

“Over the last four months, I’ve attended three hearings in the Rowe Litigation regarding his “threat” to file commercial lines against William Morris, Dentons LLP, Loeb & Loeb LLP and various individuals including Michael P. Zweig. These hearings make a further mockery out of our judicial system and raise further doubts about this court’s legitimacy. Attorneys for Dentons LLP — Rowe’s former counsel — and Loeb & Loeb LLP — sans Michael P. Zweig — are now sitting side by side, arguing before 91 years old Patterson to hold Rowe in contempt for filing $500 million dollar liens against each company and $100 million liens against each individual, including Zweig, and thus violating Patterson’s fraudulently issued Permanent Injunction. It’s obvious that Patterson should not have prevented Rowe’s case from being decided by an impartial jury and had [P. Kevin Castel] upheld this nation’s antidiscrimination statutes, the merits of my case should have also been determined by an impartial jury.”

Source: Pl. March 17, 2014 Fraud Upon the Court Motion, 90.

“President Reagan promised today to use the rest of his second term to appoint Federal judges who seek ‘judicial restraint,’ and he criticized those who view courts as ‘vehicles for political action and social experimentation.’”

Ensuring that the public policy goal of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 — eradicating discrimination in the public and private sector , resulting in more diverse workplaces — was upheld, would most likely constitute as a form of “social experimentation.”

The federal district court judge in Leonard Rowe’s case was appointed by Reagan…

Source: Bernard Weinraub. “Reagan Says He’ll Use Vacancies to Discourage Judicial Activism.” New York Times. October 22, 1985. http://www.nytimes.com/1985/10/22/world/reagan-says-he-ll-use-vacancies-to-discourage-judicial-activism.html.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3), one of the grounds warranting “relief from a final judgment, order, or proceeding” is “fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party,” or pursuant to 60(b)(6), “any other reason that justifies relief.”

In both my March 17, 2014 Fraud Upon the Court Motion and April 11, 2014 Motion for Reconsideration, I argued that Christian Carbone did not disclose to the SDNY or myself at any time since I filed the complaint with the SDNY on December 21, 2010, that he was married to an executive — Sasha Angelique Carbone — at the American Arbitration Association [the same forum William Morris and Loeb & Loeb LLP wanted to have the case moved to so that the merits of my claims of institutionalized racism could never be decided by an impartial jury]. I argued that his failure to disclose was unethical, further demonstration of Loeb & Loeb LLP’s “pattern” of “fraud upon the Court,” their intentional violations of many Rules under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, as well as violations of the New York Judiciary Law section 487. Based on the fraud that Michael Zweig and Loeb & Loeb LLP engaged in (e.g. “Exhibit 31”) and got away with to obtain a favorable verdict in Rowe, it is clear that they should have never been allowed to represent William Morris in my case. I also argued the Carbone’s marriage further demonstrated that the AAA was NEVER the “neutral” forum that it proclaimed to be [Arbitrator David L. Gregory and the AAA were aware before I found out] and that this gave additional support to my initial arguments that were raised before the SDNY and Second Circuit: based on William Morris’ 110 year history of intentional systemic disparate treatment against African Americans in employment which pre-dated my employment and I alleged occurred during my employment, arbitration was an inappropriate forum for this particular case to be resolved, as both a matter of law and public policy.

The “honorable,” Republican appointed federal judge P. Kevin Castel’s make no real discussion of arguments in his September 5, 2014 Final Order, which confirmed the fraudulently procured Award of the second “arbitrator” [Timothy K. Lewis] who vacated Arbitrator Gregory’s Partial Final Award [which concluded that William Morris discriminated against me because of my race and awarded me back pay, front pay, compensatory & punitive damages, and other fees and costs] after he was improperly disqualified by the AAA and ultimately dismissed my case “with prejudice and on the merits” because I continued to raise objections to the fraud that was occurring throughout my case. Instead, Castel issued a final decision which supported Lewis’ statements that I was engaging in considerable  “bad faith ” and it’s not William Morris, but it is me who is “racist”…and more specifically, I’m actually “anti-Semitic” and then stripped me of my informa pauperis status and prejudiced my appeal by stating that it would not be made in “good faith.”  #global white/”Jewish” supremacy #manifestinjustice #fraudupontheCourt #judicialcorruption

will it take me going to prison or even dying to show the world how corrupt and racist Hollywood, our judicial system and the U.S. gov’t are?

putting things in perspective: i was in middle school the year Leonard Rowe and the black concert promoters filed their civil rights and antitrust lawsuit against the William Morris Agency, Creative Artists Agency and others involved in the concert promotion industry….

I didn’t really learn about Leonard Rowe or the details of his case, until I discovered this CNN article [http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-724105] in January 2012 — nearly two years after graduating with my Masters in Music Business & Entertainment Industries from the University of Miami. At that time, I was working on my third appeal to the Second Circuit, which sought to have Republican appointed federal judge P. Kevin Castel’s erroneous Order which upheld William Morris’ procedurally and substantively unconscionable arbitration agreements and sought the judges’ (including Magistrate Judge James C.Francis IV who was also the Magistrate Judge in Rowe) disqualification due to the appearance and/or actual existence of bias, prejudice and/or impropriety in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 455 [http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455].

Imagine how I felt after reading this, given that I had already argued and presented a pyramid of evidence in all of my pleadings showing that despite William Morris’ repeated denials throughout history, they were in fact a racist Hollywood institution that had been and still is engaging in a century-plus pattern and continuing practice of discrimination against African Americans — a problem that was clearly not limited to employment. What made things even more shocking, was that 10 years after engaging in a conspiracy to conceal smoking gun evidence showing WMA and CAA employees referring to African Americans as “nigger,” “nigga,” “coon,” etc. in their outgoing and/or incoming e-mails, I was litigating my case against the same attorney and law firm: Michael P. Zweig of Loeb & Loeb LLP.

In my fist appeal filed with the Second Circuit in September 2011, I argued that based on the fact that Castel “ignored my arguments, omitted pertinent facts and misapplied the law,” there must have been some type of collusion taking place between him and opposing counsel.  The fact that Castel has not made opposing counsel respond to my Fraud Upon the Court Motion that was filed in March 2014 “speaks volumes” and further supports that they are all conspiring with one another to deprive me of my constitutional and statutory rights under the color of law and interfere with the human rights of people of African descent, in violation of the Ku Klux Klan of 1871, 42. U.S.C. § 1985.

As I have always argued, in one way or another: In order to effectuate the public policy goals of Civil Rights Act of 1964 (and additional anti-discrimination statutes such as the New York City Human Rights Law), arbitration is an inappropriate forum to resolve this particular case and the merits of my case should have been decided by an impartial jury reflecting the rich diversity of New York City. The fraudulent actions of the American Arbitration Association and its incompetent staff confirm this fact. Now that the Southern District of New York has jurisdiction over this case, default judgment should be granted on all claims against William Morris, Jeff Meade and Sarah Van Hoven. Even though I can and have proved the merits of all of my claims as a matter of law, default judgment should also be granted as a sanction against Michael P. Zweig and Loeb & Loeb LLP for intentionally engaging in a “pattern” of highly unethical and criminal conduct on William Morris’ behalf, in violation of New York Judiciary Law § 487 and numerous Rules under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct.

due to the fact that Dentons LLP (formerly known as Sonnenschien Nath & Rosenthal LLP), Loeb & Loeb LLP and Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP have refused to produce the underlying e-mails to “Exhibit 31” for 12 years and Arbitrator David L. Gregory admitted this document into the evidence of record in his THIRD and last Interim Decision, “Exhibit 31” does constitute smoking gun evidence of William Morris and Creative Artists Agency’s “unvarnished racial animus” against African Americans and proves that various parties, including Republican appointed federal judge Robert P. Patterson, engaged in “fraud upon the Court” to deprive Leonard Rowe and the class of black concert promoters their constitutional and statutory rights under the color of law.

“Exhibit 31”

David L. Gregory’s Third Interim Decision, September 25, 2013:

“The record is replete with facts to demonstrate violations of federal law. Booking agency defendants inadequately contest the facts and give tortured explanations to cover up their violations of plaintiffs’ rights. They seek to complicate what is actually simple (or at least straightforward). Defendants denied contractual opportunities to black promoters using their unique position in representing artists and their control of local markets. The record shows that when the booking agents and dominant white promoters act together, plaintiffs cannot get a contract. Moreover, the defendants continue to do so today.” — Bill Campbell of the Willie Gary Firm, Opposition to Def. Motion for Summary Judgment, April 24, 2003.

Since this case ended in 2005, the class of black concert promoters claims can further be proven by the fact that co-CEO of William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, also serves on the board for LiveNation…

“The plaintiffs in this action have repeatedly, consistently and continuously presented facts that prove booking agency defendants (together with other defendants) violated antitrust and civil rights laws. Defendants’ intentional actions mean black promoters have neither a fair opportunity to bid nor actual contracts to promote certain black and virtually all white acts.” — Bill Campbell of the Willie Gary Firm, Opposition to Def. Motion for Summary Judgment, April 24, 2003.