How could any non-racist and non-corrupt institution proclaiming to administer justice impartially, allow William Morris and Loeb & Loeb LLP to continue engaging in highly unethical and criminal conduct without any repercussions?

In a similar fashion to the lies contained in Arbitrator Timothy K. Lewis’s fraudulent Order dismissing my case with prejudice, Loeb & Loeb LLP also intentionally misrepresent that I did not submit a response to their Motion to Terminate. [meeting of the mind] This is a blatant LIE because both parties received confirmation e-mails from Carol Placella of the AAA, stating that the two e-mails that I asked to serve as my response (dated March 15th and 19th), were forwarded to Lewis. Although they discuss Lewis’ adverse Orders, they also continue to omit the fact that Timothy K. Lewis was unlawfully appointed and that he unlawfully vacated the Partial Final Award of the original arbitrator, David L. Gregory. This just adds to the list of their ethical violations under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct and is further reason why Zweig and his co-conspirators need to be sanctioned, disbarred and imprisoned.

I wonder how many days it will take P. Kevin Castel to respond to William Morris’ Motion (Docket No. 47). I ask because the arguments raised in their “letter” diametrically opposes the arguments made in support of my Em. Motion to Disqualify and Motion for Reconsideration and only one party is telling the truth. My Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No. 46) — a pleading which addressed the pattern of “fraud upon the Court” engaged in by Loeb & Loeb LLP and sought their disqualification, amongst other things — was submitted on April 11, 2014 and is still awaiting a decision. Castel also refused to acknowledge those arguments, as well as the evidence in support of those arguments, when he issued his March 27, 2014 Order (Docket No. 43) refusing to disqualify himself in response to my March 17, 2014 Emergency Motion to Disqualify (Docket No. 40). As a matter of law, only the court can decide a motion which seeks the disqualification of a law firm. When I gave Castel notice that I would be filing this Motion, he instructed me not to after Loeb & Loeb LLP submitted a letter response. When I filed the exhaustive Em. Motion to Disqualify, Castel ignored all arguments made against Loeb & Loeb LLP, Michael P. Zweig and Christian Carbone (similar to Republican appointed federal judge Robert P. Patterson in Leonard Rowe’s case), while instructing ME to continue arbitrating the case in “good faith.” When I brought these intentional omissions to Castel’s attention and requested an oral hearing on March 28, 2014 (Docket No. 44), he stated in a handwritten note on April 2, 2014 (Docket No. 45), that my request for an oral hearing was “moot” and again, refused to address the serious accusations that Loeb & Loeb LLP and its attorneys were engaging in a pattern of “fraud upon the Court” on William Morris’ behalf,  so that ultimately, the merits of these legitimate civil rights cases could never be heard in a public forum and decided by an impartial jury.

At this stage, I am left with no other choice than to sue all parties responsible for conspiring to interfere with the human rights of people of African descent and depriving me of my rights under the color of law. Nearly four years of my life have been wasted fighting against a law firm that should have never been allowed to represent William Morris based on what occurred in Rowe and this Republican appointed, racially biased judge cannot give himself the authority to decide whether or not I can sue him (as well as the other parties named) for depriving me of my constitutional, statutory and God-given rights under the color of law.

An impartial jury must correct this manifest injustice. If not, our nation’s democracy is nothing more than a hypocrisy.