Tagged: common sense
Since the allegedly “IMPARTIAL” and “INDEPENDENT” three-member panel consisted of two individuals of African descent, they were in the best position to explain to me why ALL of my legal arguments, especially my Title VII claims, were not sufficient or “arguable” as a matter of law, especially since the only lawfully appointed arbitrator – David L. Gregory of the American Arbitration Association – concluded that “William Morris Endeavor Entertainment LLC discriminated against [me] in violation of pertinent federal, state, and local law prohibiting discrimination in employment on the basis of race” and awarded me the full gamut of monetary damages, including punitive damages and pro se attorneys fees.
As token minorities in America’s historically all-white judicial system, anyone who thought that those two [Laura Taylor Swain of the Southern District of New York and Raymond J. Lohier, appointed by Clinton and Obama respectively] had enough power to reverse the decision of Republican appointed federal judge P. Kevin Castel and say that William Morris’ 117 year pattern and continuing practice of excluding qualified African Americans from meaningful positions of employment violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 & New York City Human Rights Law, that Arbitrator Gregory issued a “final” decision regarding the issue of arbitrability and liability and thus his Partial Final Award was reviewable by Castel, that Gregory’s disqualification by the AAA violated due process or that Loeb & Loeb LLP and Michael P. Zweig have engaged in a “pattern” of “fraud upon the Court” to prevent civil rights cases against William Morris from reaching an impartial jury in New York City, must be dumb or STUPID AS FUCK. 😩😂😩😂😆
who is the racist “Witness 40” that committed PERJURY in the Mike Brown trial?!
With all of the things that have been revealed since the grand jury failed to indict Darren Wilson for the unarmed killing of Michael Brown, how can any objective and reasonable person conclude that justice was impartially administered in this case without regards to race, color, national origin and/or class? It is shit like this that undermines our multicultural society’s confidence in our nation’s predominately all-white judicial system.
so wait. Wilson shot at Mike Brown while he was running and after being shot, Brown turned around and raged at Wilson like a “demon”??? Hmmm…no [black] person is THAT stupid…#whitelies
Only a majority all-white jury would believe that bullshit.
there is nothing they can say at this point that can refute the pyramid of evidence i have proving institutionalized racism in Hollywood & how corruption is vertically integrated throughout America’s judicial system. #fact
No matter what Arbitrator David L. Gregory decides in this case next month, that decision will have to be appealed because he denied me due process by prematurely and erroneously dismissing both of my conspiracy claims in his third Interim Decision, while simultaneously admitting smoking-gun, spoliated evidence that proves all of my claims, including claims of antitrust violations and conspiracy to interfere with civil rights! Smh. The fact that he has now admitted “Exhibit 31” into the evidence of the record after Republican appointed federal judge Robert P. Patterson dismissed it 8 years ago as an “unidentified and unauthenticated document” in Rowe Entertainment v. William Morris Agency et al., further PROVES what I have been arguing for nearly the last three years: the “discrimination” provision and/or the two arbitration agreements i signed as a condition of employment are unconscionable, tainted with illegality and malum in se AND arbitration is an inappropriate forum for this case because the public policy goals of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Sherman Act and additional statutes being used to help eradicate institutionalized racism and employment discrimination throughout Hollywood (particularly at William Morris Endeavor Entertainment) cannot be effectuated in such an inadequate, quasi-judicial forum. This case should remain in the federal court and be decided by an impartial jury reflecting the diversity of New York City!!!
a “no brainer”…unless you’re CORRUPT (and extremely RACIST)!
“There should be no need to codify a rule that advises lawyers not to lie, falsify statements, fail to disclose properly requested material facts, manufacture evidence, or engage in perjury. Common sense and personal integrity make these obligations obvious.
One area that may present problems for lawyers involves the preservation, retention, and uncovering of discoverable documents, electronically stored information, and other materials. Clients may be inclined to destroy potentially harmful information, and lawyers need to advise them to follow the law. Clients who have a proper and appropriate document retention policy may be able to periodically destroy or delete information but not if litigation is or may be imminent. And some less than forthcoming clients may be inclined to hide or withhold harmful information from discovery. Lawyers need to be aware of these possible tendencies and counsel their clients to always do the right thing.”
Source: Roger S. Haydock and David F. Herr, Discovery Practice. 2011.
Me Against Iniquity: Understanding the Complexities of Global White Supremacy (Racism) Through The Eyes of an Unapologetically BLACK Intellectual 