Tagged: words

“The judiciary’s power comes from its words alone — judges command no army and control no purse. In a democracy, judges have legitimacy only when their words deserve respect, and their words deserve respect only when those who utter them are ethical. Opinion writing is public writing of the highest order; people are affected not only by judicial opinions but also by how they are written. Therefore, judges and the opinions they write — opinions scrutinized by litigants, attorneys, other judges, and the public — are held, and must be held, to high ethical standards. Ethics must constrain every aspect of the judicial opinion.”

The reason they can’t say anything is because I have proven each and every single one of my claims against William Morris, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Michael P. Zweig, Christian Carbone, P. Kevin Castel, Timothy K. Lewis, the American Arbitration Association, the United States of America and others beyond a reasonable doubt. The conspiracy to interfere with the human rights of people of African descent is still on-going. Can’t you see? Who the fuck do these people think they are to deny my appeal without explanation or reason or mention of my claims of “fraud upon the Court”? Jacobs, Swain & Lohier: You are not God nor are you above the law. You three, as well as Chin, Lynch, Hall, Castel, Patterson, and Preska, will be held accountable for your highly unethical and criminal conduct.

Source: Alifya V. Curtin, Gerald Lebovitz & Lisa Solomon. Ethical Judicial Opinion Writing. The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. Vol. 21, 237. 2008.