Tagged: partiality

“The essence of judicial independence is that any litigant or lawyer appearing before a judge can be certain that the judge will rule according to the applicable rules and precedents without any external influence.”

Source: Leslie W. Abramson. The Judge’s Ethical Duty to Report Misconduct by Other Judges and Lawyers and its Effect on Judicial Independence. Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 25: Iss. 3, Article 4. pg. 752. 1997.

“Pleadings are intended to serve as a means of arriving at fair and just settlements of controversies between litigants. They should not raise barriers which prevent the achievement of that end. Proper pleading is important, but its importance consists in its effectiveness as a means to accomplish the end of a just judgment.”

Source: Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 303 U.S. 197 (1938).

the RACIST & DISHONORABLE federal judge in Leonard Rowe’s case — Robert P. Patterson — has passed away!!! 😱😱😱

I’m in disbelief right now. My only run in with Patterson was at the conference that took place on January 24, 2014 [see transcript below].

As you can see, Leonard ripped Patterson a new one and Patterson could do nothing about it, because he knew Leonard was telling the truth. Smdh.

After the conference ended, I told him that fraud had been perpetrated upon the Court and that he knew “Exhibit 31” was authentic, or else Arbitrator David L. Gregory wouldn’t have admitted the document into the evidence of record in my case.

My only regret is that Patterson wasn’t impeached before he passed. May his racist soul rot in hell.

“Systemic lying involves the cooperation of multiple actors in the legal system who lie or violate their oaths across cases for a consistent reason that is linked to their conception of justice…Through a series of case studies, it shows that systemic lying emerges as a saving mechanism that mediates between culture and law. Rather than allow the law to take its course and deliver what would be perceived as unjust outcomes, participants lie and preserve the facade of a system that delivers results consonant with popular moral intuitions. Systemic lying is both persistent and powerful because it achieves a type of licitness that individual lies or underground deception lack. At the same time, it poses a unique threat to the legitimacy of the system by signifying that truth is not paramount in the courtroom.”

Source: Julia Simon-Kerr. Systemic Lying. pg. 1. September 2014.

the statements made by PKC in the various Orders he has issued throughout my case have been fatuous, not factual.

if certain companies are exempt from fully complying with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and claims of INTENTIONAL systemic disparate treatment & disparate impact cannot be raised, then say that so [pro se] plaintiffs like myself won’t waste time advancing “frivolous” legal theories to the facts of the case or be accused of engaging in bad faith when the finder of fact refuses to acknowledge the evidence in support of those claims over the course of 4 years…

“[T]he whole is sometimes greater than the sum of the parts. The cumulative effect of a judge’s individual actions, comments and past associations could raise some question about impartiality, even though none (taken alone) would require recusal.”

Source: In re Martinez-Catala, 129 F.3d 213, 221 (1st Cir. 1997).

“An appearance of impropriety occurs when reasonable minds, with knowledge of all the relevant circumstances disclosed by a reasonable inquiry, would conclude that the judge’s honest, integrity, impartiality, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge is impaired. Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judges. A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. This prohibition applies to both professional and personal conduct…Actual improprieties under this standard include violations of law, court rules, or other specific provisions of this Code.”

Source: Commentary for Canon 2 of the Judicial Code of Conduct.

“An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society. A judge should maintain and enforce high standards of conduct and should personally observe those standards, so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved.”

Source: Judicial Code of Conduct, Canon 1