Tagged: inability to enforce affirmative action plans August 28, 2014 “The Arbitration Fairness Act also appears to be based on the notions that (1) pre-dispute arbitration clauses impeded the ‘constitutional rights of individuals,’ (2) individuals ‘have little or no meaningful option whether to submit their claims to arbitration,’ and (3) ‘courts have erroneously upheld even egregious unfair mandatory arbitration clauses.’ These longstanding criticisms have all been fully addressed and rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court because of the lack of any evidence supporting them.” — International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution (CPR)
August 28, 2014 “The Arbitration Fairness Act also appears to be based on the notions that (1) pre-dispute arbitration clauses impeded the ‘constitutional rights of individuals,’ (2) individuals ‘have little or no meaningful option whether to submit their claims to arbitration,’ and (3) ‘courts have erroneously upheld even egregious unfair mandatory arbitration clauses.’ These longstanding criticisms have all been fully addressed and rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court because of the lack of any evidence supporting them.” — International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution (CPR)
Me Against Iniquity: Understanding the Complexities of Global White Supremacy (Racism) Through The Eyes of an Unapologetically BLACK Intellectual 