This was stated two weeks AFTER Arbitrator Gregory issued his second Interim Decision on July 15, 2013, which pretended that I did not submit a pyramid of evidence demonstrating that “Exhibit 31” was an authentic document. On July 26, 2013 I submitted my Motion for Clarification and Modification, addressing the numerous factual errors contained in the decision. Four days later, Arbitrator Gregory held a conference call and stated the above quote, and many other things that he purposefully chose not to say in his second Interim Decision. Even though I submitted no additional evidence regarding “Exhibit 31,” Arbitrator Gregory admitted the document into the evidence of record in his third Interim Decision on September 25, 2013 and ordered William Morris to pay the costs of my e-discovery expert to retrieve the underlying e-mails that had been concealed for more than a decade. Right before I was set to acquire this evidence, Arbitrator Gregory abruptly “suspend[ed]” discovery and cancelled the oral hearing. He instead instructed both parties to submit Final Position Statements before he issued his “final” decision. In his final decision, he still continued to act on the fence about the document and then tried to state that nothing would have been produced from the search! Smh

William Morris and Loeb & Loeb LLP would like for people to believe that I bullied Arbitrator Gregory into being honest and admitting “Exhibit 31” into the evidence of record after Republican appointed federal judge Robert P. Patterson in Rowe Entertainment v. William Morris Agency et al. (98 Civ. 8272) stated in January of 2005 that “Exhibit 31” was “unidentified and unauthenticated document” and concluded that it was “irrelevant” and “inadmissible” buried deep within the footnotes of a 175 page Order in William Morris’ favor, and then stated in 2012, that Rowe’s claims that his former attorneys at Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP (now known as Dentons LLP) conspired with attorneys for Loeb & Loeb LLP and Weil Gostshal & Manges LLP to ensure that any smoking gun evidence generated would not be deemed admissible in a court of law by violating the protocol set forth by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis and agreeing to inform the class of black concert promoters that “no derogatory terms” were found even if they were, was full of “hot air and paranoid suspicions.” Although all four of Leonard Rowe’s former attorneys have stated that no derogatory terms were ever found, SNR has never claimed that this document is fraudulent and the name of their law firm name is clearly listed on the header of the document [because it was faxed to the Willie Gary Firm on October 15, 2002 after Leonard Rowe discovered the document on the desk of his attorney Raymond Heslin]. Patterson did everything in his power to remove guilt from the predominately white/”Jewish” institutions and individuals that engaged in this highly unethical and criminal conduct that ultimately prevent an impartial jury from deciding the merits of Rowe’s claims, and placed full blame on the Willie Gary Firm [although he is not entirely innocent as well]! Racism is truly a mental disease! Patterson is now 90+ years old and it is pretty obvious, that he is unfit to serve on the bench and needs to be impeached immediately!

Not surprising that Republican appointed federal judge P. Kevin Castel makes no mention of “Exhibit 31” or that I have alleged that Michael P. Zweig and Loeb & Loeb LLP have engaged in a “pattern” of  “fraud upon the Court” in his Final Order, which confirmed the fraudulently procured Final Award issued by Schnader LLP attorney Timothy K. Lewis dismissing my case with prejudice although the original arbitrator ruled in my favor, granted William Morris $43,707.20, imposed a filing injunction against me, stripped me of my in forma pauperis status although my financial circumstances have only worsened since being granted this status by Chief Judge Loretta A. Preska in January of 2011 and lastly, prejudiced my appeal by stating that it would not be made in “good faith” [if i could afford it]…Smh.

Castel has intentionally violated numerous canons under the Judicial Code of Conduct, as well as violated his Oath of Office, in order to deprive me of my constitutional and statutory rights under the color of law. This is part of a larger conspiracy by those who classify themselves as white to interfere with the human rights of people of African descent because at the end of the day, William Morris is still being allowed to violate the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and maintain its discriminatory employment practices, policies and procedures with reckless disregard for the federally protected rights of African Americans and people of color while being allowed to state to the world and their employees that they do not discriminate against African Americans. Castel actions were premeditated and no matter what the law stated, he was going to ensure that the merits of my case were never decided by an impartial jury. He must also be held accountable for his unlawful and highly unethical actions.