Tagged: en banc

As expected, the Second Circuit en banc REFUSES to UPHOLD THE LAW and DENIES Motion for Reconsideration without explanation or providing an ethical judicial opinion; CONTINUES to PRETEND that INSTITUTIONAL RACISM is a FIGMENT OF MY IMAGINATION.

I’m just finding out that on April 30, 2015 — a day after the protests in Baltimore — the 2nd Cir. en banc denied my Motion for Reconsideration, although I demonstrated that all of legal conclusions reached by district court judge P. Kevin Castel were erroneous as both a matter of law and public policy and that appellate judges Dennis Jacobs, Raymond J. Lohier and district court judge Laura Taylor Swain, erred by refusing to uphold the law and vacate Castel’s Order.

Order:

Motion for Reconsideration En Banc:

I knew they wouldn’t be able to remain impartial because they refused to acknowledge or address Title VII, the case law supporting that Arbitrator David L. Gregory’s Partial Final Award which concluded that William Morris discriminated against me because of my race was reviewable by the Southern District of New York and never mentioned my claims of “fraud upon the Court” [e.g., ‘Jewish’ Loeb & Loeb LLP attorney Michael P. Zweig was involved in a conspiracy to conceal smoking gun evidence in a prior racial discrimination case but sits on Second Circuit Courts Committee, never discussing that Loeb & Loeb LLP attorney is married to General Counsel for the American Arbitration Association and never disclosed this information to myself or the court, etc.], which is why I originally asked for my appeal to be transferred to another circuit. Yet again, my appeal was denied without the issuance of an ethical judicial opinion.

The only way William Morris and Loeb & Loeb LLP could obtain favorable verdicts in this case is through fraud — this is why the appellate court can’t discuss the law or legal arguments raised! These unethical and corrupt Article III federal judges are an embarrassment to America’s judicial system and are blatantly flouting our nation’s antidiscrimination laws in order to preserve the myth of white racial superiority throughout America and the world. Each and every single one of them needs to be IMPEACHED for refusing to uphold their oaths and intentionally violating the Judicial Code of Conduct, as well as the U.S. Constitution!

It’s time to take this case to the Supreme Court!

read my Em. Motion for Reconsideration En Banc, or in the Alternative, Motion to Recall the Mandate Pending the Filing of a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court

Scales-Of-Justice

The Second Circuit rendered its decision on March 11, 2015. I received the Order in the mail on March 17, 2014 and pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 40, the Motion for Reconsideration was due by March 25, 2014. I actually wrote this 15-page Motion in two days after I decided to scrap the Motion I was working on.

This case was destined to reach the Supreme Court, so I wasn’t too concerned about the decisions of the lower courts because I know for a fact that as a matter of law, I have proven my claims against William Morris, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Michael P. Zweig and others beyond a reasonable doubt.

In the end, it all works out because writing this Motion helped prepare me to write my petition for a writ of certiorari. If the Second Circuit is going to issue another 2 sentence Order falsely saying my appeal “lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact,” then I asked them to issue their decision no later than April 1, 2015. I think that’s pretty reasonable since they aren’t upholding the law or discussing the facts of the case…or even providing an ethical judicial opinion which is required of an Article III federal judge in a case of this magnitude.

To Clarence and his racist white buddies in black robes on the bench: “I been waiting on [ya’ll] at the do’!” Lmao!!! (shout out to Ms. Foxy!!)

update from the 2nd Circuit: Motion To Recall Mandate & Vacate Improvident Order filed in Washington v. WME Ent. case!

For the last three months, I have had the psychologically daunting task of addressing the Second Circuit’s error in denying my appeal without reason. After extensive research, this motion asks the Court to recall its mandate and either: (1) vacate its improvident order and articulate en banc’s decision or (2) articulate en banc’s decision and stay the mandate for 90 days, pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari. Read my arguments discussing why the Second Circuit erred by denying my appeal as “moot,” why the Court is guilty of violating many of its ethical Canons under the Judicial Code of Conduct and why this is part of a larger conspiracy over the last thirty two years by the majority conservative judiciary to eviscerate many of the gains made during the civil rights movement, which may create a cause of action for reparations if the Court can’t remain impartial.