Tagged: Ariel Emanuel

Based on the pyramid of evidence I’ve presented demonstrating William Morris’ intentional pattern and CONTINUING practice of discriminating against African Americans and people of color in employment spanning 116 years, any “final” decision that doesn’t grant my request for affirmative and permanent injunctive relief, is erroneous as both a matter of law and public policy.

What is the racial composition of William Morris Endeavor Entertainment’s workforce in America and throughout the world after merging with IMG for $2.3 billion?

the L.A. Times agrees! the “Jews” “RUN” Hollywood.

I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe “the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews,” down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.

How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.

The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (take a guess). The scathing rebuttal to the ad was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emanuel (Jew with Israeli parents) on the Huffington Post, which is owned by Arianna Huffington (not Jewish and has never worked in Hollywood.)

The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.

As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between “The 700 Club” and “Davey and Goliath” on TV all day.

So I’ve taken it upon myself to re-convince America that Jews run Hollywood by launching a public relations campaign, because that’s what we do best. I’m weighing several slogans, including: “Hollywood: More Jewish than ever!”; “Hollywood: From the people who brought you the Bible”; and “Hollywood: If you enjoy TV and movies, then you probably like Jews after all.”

In typically arrogant fashion, one of “God’s Chosen people” concludes the article with:

I appreciate Foxman’s concerns. And maybe my life spent in a New Jersey-New York/Bay Area-L.A. pro-Semitic cocoon has left me naive. But I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.

When I present a pyramid of historical and statistical evidence to demonstrate that Hollywood was created and is still overrepresented by “Jews” who collectively harbor a racial animus and/or implicit racial biases against African Americans and people of color, I am called “racist” and “anti-Semitic” although what I am saying is not false, nor has it been proven to be false. When Joel Stein states the obvious, it’s all good…

Source: Joel Stein. “Is Hollywood Run by Jews? You Bet.” LA Times. December 19, 2008. http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/19/opinion/oe-stein19

William Morris Endeavor Entertainment: “[You] may have been able to engage in intentional discrimination against African Americans for 116 years, but [you] won’t get away with it FOREVER!”

A comment made while talking to my dad today. Happy birthday!!

wtf. i’ve been working so hard that i was six months late in finding out about this feud between Irving Azoff and co-CEO of WME Ariel Emanuel, in which Azoff accuses Emanuel of getting away with “CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR”!!!??!!!

ari_emanuel_irving_azoff

Has Ari gone after Irving for defamation, slander and libel? I do not think so, nor will he. So how the hell does Arbitrator Gregory think he’s going to find me guilty of defamation against William Morris, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Michael P. Zweig and others for accusing them of doing the SAME DAMN THING??? At the end of the day, the arbitrator has no jurisdiction to make that decision given that he refused to decide both of my conspiracy claims and a jury has to decide this criminal matter. #fraud #racism #conspiracy #globalJewishsupremacy #globalwhitesupremacy

Source: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/irving-azoffs-wife-ari-emanuel-574960.

“the evolution of the APEX DOCTRINE.”

As you would expect, the term “apex” refers to those individuals, particularly executives, at the “apex” or the top of a company or an organization. While courts have referred to and described the apex doctrine in several decisions, arguably the most widely recognized description comes from the Texas Supreme Court from Crown Cent. Petroleum Corp. v. Garcia, 904 S.W.2d 125 (Tex. 1995), and In re Alcatel USA, Inc., 11 S.W.3d 173 (Tex. 2000):

When a party seeks to depose a corporate president or other high level corporate official and that official (or the corporation) files a motion for protective order to prohibit the deposition accompanied by the official’s affidavit denying any knowledge of relevant facts, the trial court should first determine whether the party seeking the deposition has arguably shown that the official has any unique or superior personal knowledge of discoverable information. If the party seeking the deposition cannot show that the official has any unique or superior personal knowledge of discoverable information, the trial court should grant the motion for protective order and first require the party seeking the deposition to attempt to obtain the discovery through less intrusive methods…. After making a good faith effort to obtain the discovery through less intrusive methods, the party seeking the deposition may attempt to show (1) that there is a reasonable indication that the official’s deposition is calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and (2) that the less intrusive methods of discovery are unsatisfactory, insufficient or inadequate. Crown Cent. Petroleum Corp. v. Garcia, 904 S.W.2d 125, 128 (Tex. 1995); see alsoLiberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Superior Court, 10 Cal. App. 4th 1282, 13 Cal. Rptr. 2d 363 (1992) (“particularly instructive” to the Crown Central court on apex doctrine guidelines).

Source: Kip J. Adams and Christopher M. Tauro. “Protect High-Level Corporate Officials from Unnecessary Depositions: Use of the Apex Doctrine.” 54 No. 2 DRI For Def. 8. 2012.

Ari[el], Rahm and Ezekiel Emaunel: “The underlying message was that if you were not skilled at the thrust and parry of kitchen table debate, then there was something wrong with you. The Emanuels did not have to accommodate to the world, the world had to accommodate to them.”

The quote is an excerpt from the Emanuel brothers’ new book. NBC’s Brian Williams questioned them about it and check out the interview to see their arrogant response. Read some of the comments if you have time. That additional footage needs to be seen…

Source: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/ari-emanuel-sends-legal-letter-430572.