if the finder of fact concluded that a company did in fact engage in an intentional pattern and practice of racial discrimination against African Americans and people of color for 112 years, would I be justified in seeking to have my employment discrimination claims, which include disparate impact and pre and post-hiring individual disparate treatment, decided by an impartial jury in the federal court — despite signing a mandatory, pre-dispute arbitration agreement as a condition of employment? Congress must pass the Arbitration Fairness Act!!

September 26, 2014

Written by MarcusLutherX Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with agent, American Arbitration Association, antidiscrimination law, arbitrability, arbitration, arbitration agreement, Arbitration Fairness Act, civil rights, conspiracy to interfere with the human rights of people of African descent, critical race theorist, disparate impact, employment discrimination, federal court, global white supremacy (racism), Hollywood, human rights, institutionalized racism, job discrimination, jurisdiction, law, NYCHRL, NYSHRL, public interest, public policy, racism, racist, section 1981, statutory claims, structural racism, systemic disparate treatment, title vii, unconscionability, unemployment, william morris agency