P. Kevin Castel says my request for an oral hearing to discuss the fraud William Morris, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Michael P. Zweig, Christian Carbone and others are engaging in is “moot.”

This is the second time this word has been used by these racist and corrupt ass, white (and one Asian) federal judges in the S.D.N.Y. and the Second Circuit. Neither personal stake or issue mootness exist because FRAUD is occurring and I’ve presented a pyramid of evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that this is a fact. Castel won’t even address it and he needs to be impeached for intentionally depriving me of my rights under the color of law, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242!

To demonstrate that I’m being screwed over and that they are all engaging in a conspiracy to interfere with the human rights of African Americans, in violation of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, now codified as 42 U.S.C. § 1985, and 18 U.S.C. § 241, the AAA stated over a year ago that they were unable to address my claims of the unethical and criminal conduct engaged in by Michael P. Zweig, Christian Carbone and Loeb & Loeb LLP on behalf of William Morris, and despite the circumstances, I still achieved a favorable verdict in arbitration. Now, after receiving a “final” decision and bringing to the federal court’s attention the massive fraud that William Morris and Loeb & Loeb LLP have engaged in since the inception of this case, P. Kevin Castel tells me to continue arbitrating the case in “good faith” and refuses to address my accusations of “fraud upon the Court” in either of his “orders” and denies my request for an oral hearing as “moot” without requiring a response from William Morris & Loeb & Loeb LLP!!

This is similar to what happened with Leonard Rowe’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 Motion for “Fraud Upon the Court,” filed in March of 2012. William Morris, CAA, Loeb & Loeb LLP and Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP never responded to the Motion. Nor did Patterson compel them to do so, even after four of Leonard Rowe’s former attorneys (all white and/or “Jewish”) from Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP (now known as Dentons LLP) submitted perjurious Declarations stating that “no derogatory words” were ever found during the search. This is clearly a lie. SNR was the only firm invovled with electronic discovery in that case. Leonard Rowe discovered what is now known as “Exhibit 31” on the desk of his former attorney Raymond Heslin. On October 15, 2002, SNR faxed the document to Leonard Rowe’s co-counsel, the Willie Gary Law Firm and it was included it as “Exhibit 31” in their Opposition to Summary Judgment. The SNR attorneys did not know this because they left the case a few months after Leonard discovered the document on Raymond Heslin’s desk and they took the risk of continuing to state under “penalty of perjury” that no derogatory words were found, because at that time, Leonard Rowe never had possession of the document. On the same day that the forth attorney submitted their Declaration, I went to the Southern District of New York and retrieved “Exhibit 31.”  No oral hearing was held. When Patterson issued his decision on November 8, 2012, he made no mention of this, and instead, blamed the Willie Gary Firm. Hahaha! He also said Leonard Rowe’s accusations were “full of hot air and paranoid suspicions,” but the fact the Arbitrator David L. Gregory admitted this document into the evidence of record in my case supports that there is truth to what Leonard is saying.

Proof that Castel is not upholding the law: It is well settled that the federal court, not any arbitral forum, determines whether or not a law firm should be disqualified. See e.g., Northwestern National Insurance Company v. Insco, Ltd, 11 Civ. 1124 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y. October 3, 2011) (the court granted a motion to disqualify the law firm of Freeborn & Peters LLP from continuing to represent its client Insco in an ongoing arbitration). Smdh! He did the same thing when he wrote his July 20, 2011 decision, which erroneously compelled this case into arbitration in order to prevent an impartial jury from deciding the merits of my claims. He’s violating many Canons under the Judicial Code of Conduct to protect William Morris, Loeb & Loeb LLP and their other co-conspirators, in an effort to maintain global white supremacy (racism).

I guess it’s time to begin working on the complaint for a separate action against Loeb & Loeb LLP, Michael P. Zweig, Christian Carbone, Sasha Carbone, the AAA, P. Kevin Castel and others.

Leave a comment