Bradley A. Nankerville is doing all of this “legal research” on behalf of Timothy K. Lewis, but did either bother to read section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act, which CLEARLY states that ONLY THE FEDERAL COURT CAN VACATE THE AWARD OF AN ARBITRATOR!? #fraud #unjustenrichment #payme

9 U.S.C. § 10 states:

a) In any of the following cases the United States court in and for the district wherein the award was made may make an order vacating the award upon the application of any party to the arbitration

(1) where the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means;
(2) where there was evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators, or either of them;
(3) where the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, upon sufficient cause shown, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy; or of any other misbehavior by which the rights of any party have been prejudiced; or
(4) where the arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.
(b) If an award is vacated and the time within which the agreement required the award to be made has not expired, the court may, in its discretion, direct a rehearing by the arbitrators.
(c) The United States district court for the district wherein an award was made that was issued pursuant to section 580 of title 5 may make an order vacating the award upon the application of a person, other than a party to the arbitration, who is adversely affected or aggrieved by the award, if the use of arbitration or the award is clearly inconsistent with the factors set forth in section 572 of title 5.

The law is pretty straightforward here, so for federal judge P. Kevin Castel to allow the AAA and Lewis to violate the law, to the benefit of William Morris and Loeb & Loeb LLP, is further proof that he should be disqualified from this case due to his own bias, prejudice and impropriety, and ultimately impeached for not only conspiring to deprive me of my rights under the color of law, but for also conspiring to interfere with the human rights of African Americans.

Source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/9/10.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s