Tagged: unjust enrichment

“In United States court decisions, the defendant has been required to give up the unjust enrichment, including gains later made from it. For example, these decisions do not generally permit a thief’s children to benefit from the father’s theft. ‘[I]f a thief steals so that his children may live in luxury and the law returns his ill-gotten gain to its rightful owner, the children cannot complain that they have been deprived of what they did not own.’”

Source: Joe Feagin, Documenting the Costs of Slavery, Segregation and Contemporary Racism. Harvard BlackLetter Law Journal. pg. 50. 2004. (quoting Patricia J. Williams, The Alchemy of Race and Rights 101 (1991)).

Unjust enrichment involves circumstances that “give rise to the obligation of restitution, that is, the receiving and retention of property, money, or benefits which in justice and equity belong to another.”

Source: James Ballentine. Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, pg. 1320 (1969).

“Enormous amounts of African resources, including great human resources, and much socioeconomic development had been sacrificed to make European countries very wealthy. There is a similar connection between the great immiseration of African Americans and the enrichment and prosperity of most European Americans. Over several centuries, most whites, as individuals and families, have benefited handsomely from anti-black oppression and the transmission of ill-gotten wealth and privilege from one generation to the next. Today, the relative prosperity, long life expectancies, and high standard of living of white Americans are significantly rooted in centuries of exploitation and impoverishment of African Americans and other Americans of color.”

Source: Joe Feagin, Documenting the Costs of Slavery, Segregation and Contemporary Racism. Harvard BlackLetter Law Journal. pg. 50. 2004.

“In his probing book The World and Africa, the distinguished sociologist W. E. B. Du Bois argued that the poverty in Europe’s African colonies was a ‘main cause of wealth and luxury in Europe.'”

Source: Joe Feagin, Documenting the Costs of Slavery, Segregation and Contemporary Racism. Harvard BlackLetter Law Journal. pg. 50. 2004.

“[I]f…African Americans will not be compensated for the massive wrongs and social injuries inflicted upon them by their government during and after slavery, then there is no chance that America can solve its racial problems.”

Source: Randall Robinson. The Debt: What America Owes to Blacks. 2001.

“Understanding and awareness by the whites has not always been made any easier by historians of slavery and, as far as Britain is concerned, of its imperial past, possibly because they were part of what they were trying to describe. There is a mathematical theorem which is apposite: a mathematical system cannot be completely self-descriptive since all the rules necessary for describing the system cannot be stated within it. This theorem can be applied equally well to any political or economic system; thus the operators of slavery and the slave trade and their opponents, as well as those who wrote their history, were not able to stand far enough outside the system to describe it objectively, nor generally to analyse it accurately. What certain historians did was to perpetuate the abolition myth according to which the slave system was not a system at all. Rather it was a large and unsavoury business run by some very nasty characters who treated the poor blacks badly until a handful of white heroes organised the entire country against them, routed them after a long battle, gave liberty to the blacks, and cleansed the nation for ever more of the taint of guilt and racism. Certainly this is still the view the man in the street and his children have of their past.”

Source: Jack Gratus. The Great White Lie. pg. 13. 1973.

“British West Indian slavery was an integral part of a triangular trade in which manufactured goods for barter, such as textiles, iron, guns and spirits, left Britain for the Guinea coast, there to be exchanged for, among other goods, human cargoes. On reaching the New World these were in turn exchanged for raw materials such as sugar and cotton which were transported to Britain to be turned into manufactured products, thus completing the triangle. In this way the system perpetuated itself for the benefit primarily of those who operated it — the plantation owners, the merchants, manufacturers, ship owners, and the bankers who supplied them with the capital necessary to run their respective businesses. Profits derived from the system found their way through reinvestment into other industries and agriculture, and it is not an exaggeration to say that they contributed substantially to the development of the Industrial Revolution on which Britain’s nineteenth-century prosperity was based.”

Source: Jack Gratus. The Great White Lie. pg. 11. 1973.

“The Atlantic slave trade, the crux of the British, American and European slave system, was the largest forced transportation of human beings from one part of the globe to another in the world’s history, and certainly one of the greatest unnatural disasters of all time. It lasted approximately 250 years and estimates put the total figure of slaves transported as high as forty million. Contrary to the myth which grew up in the nineteenth century and has now become hallowed by time, slavery was not simply a business conducted by a single and clearly identifiable group of cruel and unscrupulous individuals. It was a complete, all-embracing economic system involving, directly and indirectly, the colonists of the West Indies, the inhabitants of large areas of Africa, and countless numbers of people in Europe, Britain and America.”

Source: Jack Gratus. The Great White Lie. pg. 11. 1973.

“My position is…actually fairly simple. The Arbitrator a year ago set forth a process and both parties agreed to that process and that consisted of Mr. Washington having moved for summary judgment and Respondents having cross moved for summary judgment and briefs were submitted and we anticipated and saw no reason why a decision was not rendered by the Arbitrator with respect to any of the issues that were raised on that motion, and that would include Mr. Washington’s claims that the arbitration agreement is unconscionable, as well as any issues relating to the merits of the case. That is the way it was supposed to be done.” — fraudulent Loeb & Loeb LLP “attorney”/fake ass “Jew” Michael P. Zweig

Loeb & Loeb LLP attorney Michael P. Zweig said this on August 7, 2013 during a conference call with Heather Santo on August 7, 2013.

When Arbitrator David L. Gregory rendered his Partial Final Award on December 17, 2013, he did exactly this, yet the AAA violated their own rules and the Federal Arbitration Act by allowing Loeb & Loeb LLP and William Morris to DISQUALIFY Gregory after he determined that the arbitration agreement was enforceable and concluded that “William Morris Endeavor Entertainment discriminated against [me] in violation of pertinent federal, state, and local laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race”!!!!!

This is a clear violation of my constitutional right to due process and equal protection under the law, as well as a complete violation of my civil and human rights!!!!

Loeb & Loeb LLP, Michael P. Zweig, Christian Carbone and all others who have deprived me of my rights under the color of law will be held accountable and when it’s all said and done, Zweig and Carbone will have their licenses to practice law revoked due to their criminal conduct and violations of numerous rules under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct!!!